Office Action Response

In the Indonesian trademark registration process, several stages must be completed before a mark becomes officially registered. It is common for an applicant to face a provisional refusal or an objection from a third party.

In those circumstances, the response mechanism generally falls into two main categories:

Response to a
provisional refusal
Response to an
opposition

Response to a provisional refusal

What is a provisional refusal?

A provisional refusal is a notice from a trademark examiner at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) indicating that the application may be refused based on the outcome of substantive examination.

Common reasons for a provisional refusal:

The mark is considered to lack distinctiveness.

Similarity in essential parts or in its entirety to a registered mark.

The mark is descriptive or misleading.

A response to a provisional refusal is intended to:

Rebut the examiner's grounds for refusal.

Demonstrate that the mark remains eligible for registration.

Provide legal and factual clarification.

Drafting strategy

When preparing a response to a provisional refusal, several approaches may be used, including:

01

Comparative analysis of
the marks (visual,
phonetic, conceptual).

02

Legal argument based on trademark law.

03

Evidence of
distinctiveness, including
proof of use.

Response to an opposition

What is an opposition?

After an application passes formality examination and is published in the Official Trademark Gazette, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose a trademark application they believe would prejudice their rights.

An opposition is typically filed by:

Owner of an earlier registered mark.

A party claiming to be
adversely affected.

Purpose of a response to an opposition:

A response to an opposition is the applicant's rebuttal to a third-party opposition. Its purpose is to:

Defend the applicant's rights in
the applied-for mark

Show that the opposition
lacks sufficient grounds

Ensure the application can
continue to proceed

Drafting strategy

Because this type of response involves a third party, it is generally more complex. Strategies may include:

Assessing the legal standing of the opposing party.

Rebutting the alleged harm or similarity.

Developing a structured and persuasive legal argument.

Differences between the two types of response

Response to
Provisional Refusal

Response to
Opposition

Filed by

Trademark examiner

Third party

Stage of proceedings

Substantive examination

Publication period

Primary focus

Convince the examiner

Rebut the opposing party

Why professional guidance matters

Both a response to a provisional refusal and a response to an opposition require a strong understanding of trademark law and carefully structured legal argumentation.

Contact Us
+62 822–6226–3636